Legal Articles
September 21, 2009
Denyse Sabagh - Duane Morris LLPOn August 27, 2009, Judge Alexander Williams, Jr., of the U.S. District
Court for the District of Maryland upheld the legality of a federal
regulation that will require many federal government contractors to use
the E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of new hires as
well as certain existing employees. The ruling in Chamber of Commerce
of the United States of America v. Janet Napolitano, Civil Action No.
AW-08-3444 (D. Md.), allows the regulation, published at 73 Fed. Reg.
67,651 (November 14, 2008), to take effect on September 8, 2009. Full Story
September 8, 2009
Cameron Sabin - Stoel Rives LLPComputer technology has revolutionized the way businesses operate in
today’s market. Companies that rely upon computer technology
advances to support their business are often unaware of the impacts that
technology can have on business disputes and the extent to which computer
advances have altered the legal landscape. By better understanding the
changing landscape, businesses can more effectively prepare to confront
litigation, protect business interests, and minimize the effect of legal
disputes on daily operations. Full Story
August 31, 2009
John Calender and Phillip C. Zane - Baker DonelsonDuring the presidential campaign, candidate Obama promised more vigorous
enforcement of the antitrust laws. President Obama and his new
administration have fulfilled that pledge. While some are
questioning the effectiveness of the financial stimulus packages, the
“antitrust stimulus” is clearly being felt, with new
pro-enforcement leadership at the Department of Justice Antitrust Division
and the Federal Trade Commission. Even Congress is joining in by
introducing bills to overturn recent Supreme Court antitrust decisions
favorable to defendants and by urging more aggressive enforcement of the
antitrust laws. Full Story
August 31, 2009
Mark Berman, Lee Harrington and Lesley Varghese - Nixon Peabody LLPThe U.S. Supreme Court recently declined an opportunity to address a
long-standing split of authority among the circuit courts as to which test
should be applied by bankruptcy courts when asked to determine whether an
intellectual property license can be assumed by a debtor in possession
under Section 365(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. Full Story
August 20, 2009
Joe Cline Winning a lawsuit is one thing; collecting on a judgment is another--and
it's not as easy as you think.A legal judgment, by itself, does not
guarantee that a creditor can collect the amounts awarded to him. It
merely gives a creditor the right to take the necessary steps to make a
collection. Many creditors who obtained a favorable judgment are able to
collect less than the amount due them or sometimes nothing at all. To
`win' the collecting battle, a creditor needs to use creative strategies
to speed up the process and collect what he is owed. Full Story
August 20, 2009
Michael Weiss - Barnes & Thornburg LLPIn today's economy, with financial meltdown news dominating the
headlines, one may wonder: Is there any money available to complete a
deal? Of course there is. After all, institutions that are in
the business of providing loans still needed to move money. That's
their business. There's not a hotter real estate issue today than the
funding and collateralization of loans. Before we analyze from a
legal perspective, we need to talk briefly about the business
environment. After all, law is driven by business. Business
doesn't drive law. Full Story
July 29, 2009
Joseph Woodard As most people are aware, periodic alimony payments generally continue until the death or remarriage of a former spouse. For this reason alone, countless ex-spouses delay marrying new lovers. But what if your ex is having a relationship with a new person, but has not yet tied the wedding knot? Are you still responsible for making your monthly alimony payments? Full Story
July 15, 2009
Dietrch Elliot Premises liability is a complicated issue and covers a wide range of
accidents that personal injury attorneys often categorize as the sticky
wickets of law. Why? Because at its core, premises liability is all about
figuring out who is to blame for an accident. By definition, the term
premises liability is the body of law that fixes responsibility for
injuries suffered by a third party on the person who is in possession of a
premises or piece of land. In other words, the person who occupies the land
and has intent to control it has the responsibility to make sure it is safe
and free of obvious hazards. Full Story

